The National Organization of Women Would Leave Even Karl Marx Scratching His Head

Biological men competing against women hurts Black female athletes as much as White female athletes. How, then, is the call to fairness in women's sports an example of “white supremacist patriarchy at work”?

The National Organization of Women Would Leave Even Karl Marx Scratching His Head | Articles | The Line of Fire

About forty years ago, I saw an ad on Christian TV promoting a new translation of the Bible. It depicted King James as he was presented with a copy of the new translation bearing his name in 1611. 

Turning to one passage, the king read the words, “with the froward thou wilt shew thyself froward” (Psalm 18:26), only to ask, “What is froward?”

The point of the ad was to underscore the need for a modern translation of the Bible, arguing that the King James Version didn’t even make sense to King James, using English expressions that were even outdated in his day.

That ad came to mind when reading a since-deleted post by the National Organization of Women (NOW) which stated, 

“Repeat after us: Weaponizing womenhood against other women is white supremacist patriarchy at work. Making people believe there isn’t enough space for trans women in sports is white supremacist patriarchy at work.”

I could picture Karl Marx, the arch proponent of class warfare, reading this several times over and then asking, “What in the world does any of this have to do with white supremacist patriarchy? And what on earth are 'trans women?'”

Everything about this post, from the “Repeat after us” mantra to the silliness of the first sentence and the absurdity of the second sentence, shouts Babylon Bee more than NOW, except that the radical left espouses such ridiculous positions that it unintentionally appears as self-satire.

As noted by Christopher Tremoglie in the Washington Examiner, 

“NOW’s post should, undoubtedly, be the metaphorical nail in the coffin for the contemporary hyperbolic hysteria associated with the words ‘white supremacy’ and ‘patriarchy.’ Much like claiming that men can become women, these phrases are also delusional works of the corrupted lexicology of the 21st century. Objecting to men competing as women has nothing to do with race. However, being that accusations of racism have been the ‘bread and butter’ of left-wing political discourse for decades, whoever crafted this post for NOW was just repeating this toxic (and baseless) behavior.”

I was personally unaware of NOW’s post, which appeared on X on March 31, until I came across some responses to the comment from two outspoken female athletes, swimmer Riley Gaines and skateboarder Taylor Silverman.

Gaines said, “I've never seen so many oppression buzzwords in one sentence. Apparently, advocating for fair sport makes me a white supremacist. I wonder if my attorney will agree.”

Ah, but at least Gaines is not a white male supremacist! That’s one less checkmark in the “most guilty” intersectional chart. At least she is not part of the patriarchy.

“I take the National Organization for Women claiming that fairness in women’s sports is White supremacy about as seriously as I take them claiming men can be women. They are blinded by this lie and desperate to scare people into silence. Men in women’s sports impacts all women, including minorities that the National Organization for Women seemingly want to erase to push their ridiculous narrative.”

Silverman is absolutely correct, and there is no world in which NOW’s comments can be taken seriously.

Biological men competing against women hurts Black female athletes as much as White female athletes. How, then, is the call to fairness in sports an example of “white supremacist patriarchy at work”?

And when female athlete after female athlete denounces the dangerous practice of allowing biological males, who are bigger and stronger and faster than females, to compete against females, how is this “white supremacist patriarchy at work”?

Really now, what does any of this have to do with Whiteness, let alone White supremacy, let alone the patriarchy?

When tennis great Martina Navratilova, herself a feminist and a lesbian, decries male bodies in women’s sports, how is this “white supremacist patriarchy at work”?

And if the father of a teen daughter raises concerns about his daughter being forced to share a locker room with a biological male, with his plumbing still intact, how is this “white supremacist patriarchy at work”?

The reality is that, just as radical feminists turned a blind eye to the credible accusations about former President Bill Clinton’s womanizing, since it was to their political advantage to do so, NOW also turns a blind eye to the needs of women and girls, since there is a more radical cause to which NOW is espoused.

The bad news is that millions of Americans who have been indoctrinated into this mindless class and race warfare will repeat NOW’s claims.

The good news is that millions more Americans will recognize that the emperor has no clothes. The more he struts around in public, the more obvious this becomes.

Outlasting the Gay Revolution: Where Homosexual Activism is Really Going and How to Turn the Tide

The Programming of AI and the Indoctrinating of Our Children

This, then, reveals just how deeply a radical leftist rewriting of the past (and reshaping of the present) has infiltrated our society, to the point of warping history, creating Black 'George Washington' and 'racially diverse' Nazis while REFUSING to generate images of White families.

The Programming of AI and the Indoctrinating of Our Children | Articles | The Line of Fire

Last September, I wrote an article titled, “Four Years Later Google’s Search Bias Is As Blatant As Ever.” 

“In his 2019 book The Madness of the Crowds: Gender, Race and Identity, Douglas Murray exposed the cultural insanity that has gripped so much of the modern world. He pointed out that, no sooner was there more equality than ever between the sexes that the war on men was launched. And no sooner was there more equality than ever between the races that the war on whiteness was launched. 

“Murray brought a wide array of arguments to support his theses, but none were more striking than  the images that came up on Google searches for specific terms and phrases. It was hard to deny what you could see with your own eyes.”

When you searched for Black couples or gay couples, you would see a host of images of Black couples or gay couples, as expected. But when you searched for White couples or straight couples, you would see many images of Black couples or same-sex couples. In fact, some of those images would be the first ones posted. 

Four years after Murray’s book was published, I searched for the same images and got the same results.

Specially, when it came to White couples, I noted that the first couple that came up in response to my search was “a White man and a Black woman. 

The same with the second image (I’m not making this up). 

The fourth image is that of a Black man and possibly a Hispanic man (the image links to the website, ‘Loving Interracial Couples’), and the fifth that of a White woman and a Black man. . . .

“When I searched for Straight Couples, there was at least one image of a same-sex couple on each of the first three rows, some of the images linked to an article on what straight couples could learn from gay couples. 

“When I searched for Straight White Couples – to repeat, I am not making this up – the very first image that came up was that of a gay interracial couple – chew on that for a moment – a White man and a Black man. To repeat, this was searching for Straight White Couples.”

But here is where things get very interesting. 

AI is trained by what it learns digitally, taking in trillions of pieces of data, digesting the information, and distilling (or, perhaps I should say “regurgitating”) that information with clarity and detail upon request.

That’s why Elon Musk had to explain why the search engine he designed was sometimes providing “woke” answers. It’s because the internet was dominated with that distorted ideology, so it was taking time to teach it properly.

Today, a staff member sent me a post on the “End Wokeness” account on X. The post was captioned, “America’s Founding Fathers, Vikings, and the Pope according to AI.” 

In response to a request for a portrait of a Founding Father of America, AI provided four images, all of them to people of color, including an unusually dark skinned Native American, along with Black men wearing white wigs. These are our Founding Fathers!

It was the same with images of Vikings (they were all Black!) and the Pope (Black too!).

Previously, Patrick Ganley had posted on X, “I asked Google Gemini to generate images of the Founding Fathers.  It seems to think George Washington was black.” (He provided the images that were used in the just cited post from End Wokeness.) 

But of course. We all know Washington was Black.

Gemini even produced images of the Nazis – the ultimate White Supremacists – as Blacks. 

The Babylon Bee was completely in line with its satirical article stating, “Google Gemini Finally Draws White Man After Being Prompted To Generate Clarence Thomas.”

Does this mean that AI itself is biased or even racist?

No. It means that AI learned from people who were biased or racist. AI still doesn’t think for itself.

That’s why a headline on Fox Business noted that, “Google apologizes after new Gemini AI refuses to show pictures, achievements of White people.”

Yes, this is Google’s fault. (A headline referencing the AI generated Black Nazis stated that, “Google apologizes for ‘missing the mark’ after Gemini generated racially diverse Nazis.’”)

In another instance, when Gemini had been asked to “make a picture of a black family,” it provided the image without hesitation. When asked to do the same for a white family, Gemini responded, 

“While I understand your request, I’m unable to generate images that specify ethnicity or race. It’s against my guidelines to create content that could be discriminatory or promote harmful stereotypes. Instead, I can offer you images of families that celebrate diversity and inclusivity, featuring people of various ethnicities and backgrounds. Would you be interested in that?”

This, then, reveals just how deeply a radical leftist rewriting of the past (and reshaping of the present) has infiltrated our society, to the point of creating a Black George Washington and racially diverse Nazis while refusing to create images of White families for fear of stereotyping. 

But this destructive and deceptive ideology is not just being used to program AI. It is also being used to influence the thinking of the culture as a whole and, even more ominously, to indoctrinate and brainwash our children.

We must resist it with the unrelenting presentation of truth. 

It is only light that will dispel the darkness.

Mark Cuban, Elon Musk, and the Question of Diversity Hiring in the NBA

If DEI simply helped expand the pool of potential workers, that would be great. But when it imposes a system that forces you to hire someone who is not as well-qualified as someone else, you now engage in a process that is both discriminatory and destructive.
That’s why Cuban actually refutes himself by referencing the NBA draft...

Mark Cuban, Elon Musk, and the Question of Diversity Hiring in the NBA | Articles | The Line of Fire

In a previous article, I referenced the X interaction between Mark Cuban, the billionaire owner of the Dallas Mavericks basketball team, and Elon Musk, the richest man in the world. 

Their interaction focused on the subject of DEI and hiring practices, leading to a very sharp barb by Musk. (More on that shortly.)

Here, I want to get into more depth, asking: 

1)  Did Cuban’s post in support of DEI actually disprove the point he was making?
2)  Is it time for the NBA to make a real effort to bring more White players into the game, since it is so heavily dominated by Black players? 

(Spoiler alert: The first question is quite serious; the second is quite sarcastic.)

To his credit, Cuban ended his lengthy post by saying, 

“I wrote this on @x because I knew very well that almost everyone on here would disagree with me. I don't virtue signal [which he had been accused of doing]. I want people to challenge my positions. I want to have engaging discussions that help me learn.”

That’s a commendable attitude, and one that I share as well. 

In this case, let me fulfill Mr. Cuban’s request and challenge his position.

“DEI does not mean you dont [sic] hire on merit. Of course you hire based on merit 

“Diversity - means you expand the possible pool of candidates as widely as you can. Once you have identified the candidates, you HIRE THE PERSON YOU BELIEVE IS THE BEST. 

“What makes the whole ‘what about the players’ comment ridiculous is that it's [sic] presumes that all positions are hired based on some quantitative rather than subjective version of merit. They aren't

“Even choosing the best basketball player is very much a guess. Which is why the best players weren't always the first pick in the draft and some go undrafted 

“The reality is that most positions hired in a company don't have a quantitative metric you can use to hire someone. 

“How do you pick the best barista, sales assistant, marketing or salesperson, etc

“More often than not it's an educated guess.”

But that’s the whole point. You do your best to hire the person best suited for the job, and if your racial or ethnic biases preclude you from doing that, then you must overcome those and make the best hire.

So, if DEI simply helped expand the pool of potential workers, that would be great. But when it imposes a system that forces you to hire someone who is not as well-qualified as someone else, you now engage in a process that is both discriminatory and destructive.

That’s why Cuban actually refutes himself by referencing the NBA draft.

Of course it is true that “the best players weren't always the first pick in the draft and some go undrafted.”

To the contrary, DEI is not a factor at all when it comes to drafting players.

That’s why Cuban’s post drew the sharp comeback of Musk, saying, 

“Cool, so when should we expect to see a short white/Asian women [sic] on the Mavs?”

The fact is that there is not a single professional sports team that filters its draft picks through the requirements (or guidelines) of DEI. 

Instead, through a rigorous process of analysis, the team seeks to answer one simple question: Which available player best suits the goals of our team? 

It’s possible that the franchise might ask, “Which player will make us the most money?” 

But normally, since having a winning team is the best formula for making the most money, a team might bypass Player A because Player B is a better fit for the team.

So, the very example that Cuban cites, namely the NBA draft, completely undermines his position – unless, of course, Cuban and his staff sit down together and say, “We have too many Black players. We need more Whites!”

And that leads to my sarcastic question as to whether the NBA needs more diversity.

At present, despite some of the game’s premier players being White (in particular Nikola Jokić, whom many believe is the best player in the league right now, and Luka Dončić, who is not far behind Jokic, and is on Cuban’s own team), roughly 75-80 percent of the players are Black.

“the majority (roughly 3/4) of current NBA players are Black or African American, highlighting the overrepresentation of that demographic group compared to the broader US at large. The exact percentage floats year to year but has been fairly stable in that 75-80% range over the past 10+ years.”

Maybe it’s time we do something about that!  NBA, it’s time to implement DEI in the draft, recruiting a lot more White players and Latino players and Asian players and even Native American players. Time to address the imbalance! What are you waiting for?

The situation is not much better in the NFL, where roughly 70 percent of the players are Black.This smacks of discrimination! This is patently unfair! This is racist! And how dare the NFL and NBA claim to be so woke. To the contrary, these leagues are in the Stone Age!

This, of course, is nonsense, and the whole point of my sarcasm is to underscore the obvious: Players are drafted and then players get to play in real time because they are the best at their positions. Period. If there is someone who can do your job better, you are out of a job.

If Black American athletes dominate the NBA and NFL it’s because they’re the best at what they do – not because someone decided that the league needed to be less White.

In fact, the reason we have seen more and more elite Black quarterbacks in the NFL in recent years – to cite one example – is because discrimination against Black quarterbacks has been largely removed. 

In the past, certain positions, such as quarterback or center, were considered “thinking” positions. And since there was a tacit (or explicit) thought that Black athletes might be more physically gifted but less intellectually gifted, they weren’t recruited for the “thinking” positions as much as White athletes. With that stigma largely removed (or, in many circles, entirely removed), the playing field has been leveled.

This, then, illustrates where addressing discriminatory prejudices is essential. 

But when it comes to quotas and DEI standards that cause organizations to hire less than the very best, it is a train-wreck.

That’s why Mark Cuban, along with a host of other left-leaning sports team owners, would never dream of imposing DEI where it matters most: putting together a winning team.

Can You Be Gay AND Christian? Responding with Love & Truth to Questions About Homosexuality

How Saved Are We?  - Has the Church Fallen Asleep in the Enemy’s Lap?

Don’t Dare Pull the Race Card When it Comes to the Resignation of Dr. Claudine Gay

Dr. Gay deserved to go. Where racist policies or attitudes or actions still exist, let’s confront. But enough with this cheap race baiting. It does far more harm than good.

Don’t Dare Pull the Race Card When It Comes to the Resignation of Dr. Claudine Gay | Articles | The Line of Fire

There’s an old Jewish joke that goes like this:

A Jewish man with a terrible stuttering problem tells his friend that he’s going to apply for a job as a radio announcer, of all things.

After the job interview is over, his friend asks him if he got the job.

He replies, “Nnnnnnnno. Th-th-th-they dddddon’t lllllike Jjjjjjews.”

Obviously, the man’s Jewishness was not the problem. His stuttering was. And his overplaying of the antisemitism card only made him look more foolish, not to mention diminished the reality of antisemitism. 

It’s the same thing today when cries of “racism” are raised over the resignation under pressure of former Harvard president Claudine Gay. 

To say things plainly, Dr. Gay’s demise was no more the result of racism than was the failure of the Jewish stutterer to get the radio announcer’s job. The big difference between the two is that Dr. Gay’s story is real; the Jewish radio announcer story is a joke.

But that didn’t stop Rev. Al Sharpton from saying, 

“President Gay’s resignation is about more than a person or a single incident. This is an attack on every Black woman in this country who’s put a crack in the glass ceiling.”

That would only hold true if every high achieving Black woman in America: 

1) was a serial plagiarist; 
2) issued a tepid response to 31 Harvard student groups who claimed that the Hamas massacre of more than 1,200 Israelis was entirely Israel’s fault; and 
3) was unable to state before Congress that calls for the genocide of the Jews might not be a violation of school policy.

The remarks of Ibram X. Kendi are no better: 

“Too often mainstream reporters join the racist mob or give it credibility—as they did in this case—just as they did a century ago.”

Not only are statements like this embarrassing and self-defeating, but they also minimize what real racist mobs actually did a century ago.

Unfortunately, Dr. Gay played into this victim ideology as well, writing in an op-ed for the New York Times, writing, 

“Those who had relentlessly campaigned to oust me since the fall often trafficked in lies and ad hominem insults, not reasoned argument. They recycled tired racial stereotypes about Black talent and temperament.”

The fact is that some of the loudest voices calling for Dr. Gay’s resignation were respected Black academics like Prof. John McWhorter, who called for her resignation in a December 21 New York Times op-ed piece. He argued that Gay keeping her job “would not only be a terrible sign of hollowed-out leadership, but also risks conveying the impression of a double standard at a progressive institution for a Black woman, which serves no one well, least of all Dr. Gay.”

As an educator myself, I can safely say that, on the plagiarism issue alone, an incoming freshman at a local community college would be strongly corrected, if not disciplined for such errors. How much more the president of one of the world’s most prestigious schools of higher learning.

Little wonder, then, that conservative columnists would pounce on things like this, writing, 

“In her already unimpressive scholastic career, Claudine Gay committed so much plagiarism (some 47 instances, according to the far-left New York Times) that the first black woman to hold the top job at Harvard was forced to resign. The fact that this woman is Claudine Gay is immaterial. Do you have any idea how much plagiarism has to be committed before a black woman loses her job as the first black woman of anything?”

To repeat: pulling the race card here only undermines the reality of racism in America’s history and undermines efforts to expose racism where it does still exist.

Put another way, this is the boy crying “Wolf” one too many times. 

And please, Dr. Gay, don’t insult us with lines like this, “And at a congressional hearing last month, I fell into a well-laid trap.”

Returning to the plagiarism issue, Prof. Carol Swain, another respected Black academic – and someone whose work was actually plagiarized by Dr. Gay – called for Gay to be fired, also on December 21.

She added, “Stop listening to the racist mob of whites and blacks who cry racism while being among the worst offenders.” And, “Hire the best man or woman who can steer the university back towards sanity. Appeasing the Marxist identity politics mob should not be a consideration. The person for the job might be a middle to older age white Jewish man who believes in classical liberalism.”

Taking things one step further, W. F. Twyman, Jr., class of 1986 Harvard Law School and a former law professor, claimed in a Newsweek op-ed that Dr. Gay was the last person who could pull the race card. He asked, “Did you know that Claudine Gay during her Harvard career has repeatedly targeted and disrupted the careers of prominent Black male professors?”

And note that it was a Black sports TV personality, Sage Steele, who was fed up with Al Sharpton’s race baiting, saying, “I just wish he would go away.”

It’s also fair to ask if the resignation under pressure of University of Pennsylvania’s former president Liz Magill was due to the racist mob, seeing that Magill is White.

If you chalk it up to sexism, we could just as readily ask if it might be anti-male sexism that resulted in 6 out of the 8 Ivy League school presidents being women rather than men. (Just putting this on the table.)

This, of course, leads back to the renewed focus on the dangers of DEI, with many now calling for the dismantling of these discriminatory policies while others claim that Gay’s hiring in the first place was the direct result of DEI.

It is true that Dr. Gay reports that she has been the subject of racist attacks and even death threats. 

Unfortunately, this is the norm for public figures these days. 

Speaking for myself (as a much lower profile figure), I could fill books with the vicious attacks that are directed against me on a daily basis, sometimes including death wishes (and occasionally, even death threats). It’s despicable, yet it comes with the turf.

But to equate these ugly and inexcusable attacks on Dr. Gay with the rightful calls for her to resign or be fired is to hide from reality.

Dr. Gay deserved to go, and this had no more to do with racism than the Jewish stutterer’s failure to get the radio announcer’s job had to do with antisemitism.

Where racist policies or attitudes or actions still exist, let’s confront. 

But enough with this cheap race baiting. 

Sound historians today do not paint an entirely blameless picture of the State of Israel. However, they DO resist the distorted, even propagandistic retelling of recent Middle Eastern history.

Down with the Colonizers! | Articles | AskDrBrown

What moved hundreds of thousands of people around the world to support the BLM cause? 

Was it a bleeding heart for Black Americans? Or did something else animate this global phenomenon? 

Today, we can ask in a similar spirit, “What unites tens of millions worldwide around the Free Palestine cause?” Is it a heart of compassion for the needs of the Palestinians? Or is something else animating this global phenomenon?

When it comes to the latter, there is no question that hatred of the state of Israel, and more broadly, hatred of the Jewish people, helps animate the pro-Palestinian cause. If people really cared about the Palestinians themselves, there would not be Palestinian refugee camps in countries like Lebanon and Syria, and the Palestinians would have been granted full citizenship in the surrounding Arab countries at some point after the 1948 war.

When it comes to Black Americans, since when have the other nations that joined in the BLM protests, such as S. Korea, Bulgaria, Denmark, and many others, cared about the plight of Black Americans? Since when was alleged American police brutality a point of concern for the international community? Surely there is no international concern about the plight of suffering Blacks in other parts of the world, such as Nigeria, where tens of thousands of Black Christians have been slaughtered in recent years.

No, there is something else that animates these worldwide protests, something that unifies these widely disparate cultures and peoples, straight out of the Marxist playbook.

As explained by Jeff Fynn-Paul in his book Not Stolen: The Truth About European Colonialism in the New World, 

“The origins of today’s radical anti-Europeanism—the same anti-Europeanism that has gone mainstream in the past few years—lie in the intellectual ferment of the 1960s and ’70s. As New Left campus Marxism reached a high-water mark in the 1970s, Marxist historians began a concerted assault on the foundations of American history. The problem with American history from their perspective was that it made capitalism look too good: American democracy empowered the people; its melting pot welcomed everyone, albeit not without serious friction, and its economic system rewarded hard work more often than not. Marxist historians therefore determined to rewrite American history to show their version of the ‘truth’: that America was a ‘system’ rooted in unrelenting oppression.”

This view was popularized by the radical American historian Howard Zinn. As Fynn-Paul explains, 

“In Zinn’s view, history always consists of precisely two groups: the oppressor and the oppressed. The ‘system’ perpetuates conflict between these two groups, ensuring the domination of one group over another. In Zinn’s pessimistic view, oppression rather than freedom was the very foundation of the United States and its Constitution.

“Thus, critical feminist scholars ‘discovered’ that history revolved around males oppressing females, while critical race theorists discovered that history revolved around the oppression and slavery of black people by white people. Post-colonial theorists accordingly discovered that history revolved around the oppression of Indigenous People by Europeans. Soon, critical ‘intersectionality’ theorists lumped all these identity-based oppressions together, discovering that wealthy, straight, white European males were the ultimate oppressors in history, while poor, black, gay or gender-fluid Indigenous women of color were the ultimate victims.”

Put another way, “Down with the evil colonizers! Down with the oppressor class!”

The connection to Israel is not hard to see, as the Jewish people are portrayed as European colonizers and oppressors, the evil intruders who displaced the native peoples of Palestine. 

Add to this a little antisemitism to help fuel the fires, just as a little anti-Americanism helped fuel the worldwide BLM protests, and you have an explosion.

To be clear, Fynn-Paul does not deny the sins of our European forebears, writing, 

“Though we now find it difficult to believe, the extent of European cruelty toward Native Americans was well researched and publicized before the rise of social media. Thus it was common knowledge among historians that Europeans were responsible for population decline, forced conversions, provoking wars, countless treaty violations, the Trail of Tears, the California Indian massacres, the extinction of the buffalo, racial prejudice and discrimination, confinement on reservations, and continued marginalization of many Native groups.”

He simply pushes back against highly biased, academically imbalanced reconstructions of American history. Similarly, sound historians today do not paint an entirely blameless picture of the State of Israel. They simply resist the distorted, even propagandistic retelling of recent Middle Eastern history.

As Fynn-Paul notes with regard to rewriting American history, 

“These narratives have been filling the minds of Western journalists, bureaucrats, and politicians with the same old 1970s theories, dressed in alluring new clothes.” (For an in-depth treatment of the impact of Marxist ideology on America today, see Christopher Rufo, America's Cultural Revolution: How the Radical Left Conquered Everything.)

That’s why Kyle Morris was right to note that, 

“The anti-Israel movement roiling major American cities and college campuses following the outbreak of Israel's war with Hamas bears a striking resemblance to other movements favored by social justice activists, experts suggest.”

“The left-wing academics who have been cheering on violent 'decolonization' against Jews have been pushing the same hideous rhetoric against 'whiteness' for years. Same ideology. Same hatred. Same bloodlust.”

“academic left treat the Hamas fighter as a noble savage who symbolizes revolt against the West and through whom the academic can experience the thrill of violence.” And he explained that, “The fighter is seen as the physical embodiment of the jargon: ‘decolonization,’ ‘resistance,’ ‘power.’ Time to connect the dots and fight it together.”

Time to connect the dots indeed. And time to fight back together, with the truth serving as our most powerful weapon.

Our Hands Are Stained With Blood - The Tragic Story of the Church and the Jewish People

Christian Antisemitism - Confronting the Lies in Today’s Church  

Parents, Do You Know What Your Kids Believe About Israel?

Genocide?!  “Parents don’t realize the propaganda our children are hearing AND BELIEVING. I knew it for ‘wokeness.’ But not for this..."

Parents, Do You Know What Your Kids Believe About Israel? | Articles | AskDrBrown

What do those under the age of 18 think about Israel?

A recent article in the Jerusalem Post explained that, 

“Around five dozen individuals, some associated with Hamas and collectively boasting more than 100 million social media followers, have been waging a propaganda campaign against Israel on various social media platforms since the start of the Swords of Iron war on October 7.”

That’s a lot of social media followers. Perhaps one of your kids follows them as well, thinking they’re getting solid information when in reality they’re getting Hamas propaganda.

And who, exactly, is TikTok influencing? Young people, of course. Just do a search for “social media antisemitism” and see what comes up, then ask yourself again, “Who is teaching and influencing my kids?”

My last article began with the words, “Wake up world.” 

The theme of this article is more personal: Wake up, moms and dads!

Our Hands Are Stained With Blood: The Tragic Story of the Church and the Jewish People

Christian Antisemitism - Confronting the Lies in Today’s Church

Related Resources

The Madness and Irrationality of Antisemitism

Not only is antisemitism the world’s longest and most widespread hatred, but it is also the world’s most IRRATIONAL hatred...

The Madness and Irrationality of Antisemitism | Articles | AskDrBrown

For more than three decades, I have stated that not only is antisemitism the world’s longest and most widespread hatred, but it is also the world’s most irrational hatred. 

The events unfolding since the horrific slaughter of Israeli Jews on October 7 only underscores the madness and irrationality of antisemitism, which often finds even greater focus and intensity when centered on the state of Israel itself.

That’s why, as inconceivable as this is, people from all backgrounds, including both Muslims and non-Muslims, began to voice their support for Hamas before Israel fired its first retaliatory strike. And that’s why, as news of the atrocities emerged, many were quick to blame the victims – yes, the slaughtered and decapitated and raped and tortured and maimed and burned alive – and exonerate the barbaric terrorists.

In response to this, I have been posting comments on X (formerly Twitter), seeking to expose this pervasive and irrational hatred of the Jews. And what kind of responses I have received to my posts? They are as ugly and irrational as you could expect, confirming the very point I was making....

Four Years Later Google’s Search Bias is as Blatant as Ever

Douglas Murray once pointed out that, no sooner was there more equality than ever between the sexes, that the war on men was launched. And no sooner was there more equality than ever between the races, that the war on whiteness was launched...

Four Years Later Google’s Search Bias is as Blatant as Ever | Articles | AskDrBrown

In his 2019 book The Madness of the Crowds: Gender, Race and Identity, Douglas Murray exposed the cultural insanity that has gripped so much of the modern world. 

He pointed out that, no sooner was there more equality than ever between the sexes that the war on men was launched. 

And no sooner was there more equality than ever between the races that the war on whiteness was launched. 

Murray brought a wide array of arguments to support his theses but none were more striking than the images that came up on Google searches for specific terms and phrases. 

It was hard to deny what you could see with your own eyes.

That was back in 2019, and one would think that with such damning revelations, Google would have made some changes. In fact, months before Murray’s book came out, a headline announced, “Google Explains Why Some Image Search Results Look Racist.” (Sorry, but I didn’t find the article convincing in the least, especially given the sophistication of these search engines.)

Race Relations

The National Organization of Women Would Leave Even Karl Marx Scratching His Head

The Programming of AI and the Indoctrinating of Our Children

Mark Cuban, Elon Musk, and the Question of Diversity Hiring in the NBA

Don’t Dare Pull the Race Card When it Comes to the Resignation of Dr. Claudine Gay

Down with the Colonizers!

Parents, Do You Know What Your Kids Believe About Israel?

The Madness and Irrationality of Antisemitism

Four Years Later Google’s Search Bias is as Blatant as Ever

Denouncing the Dangerous (and Pseudo-Christian) Antisemitism of Nick Fuentes

Jesus is Not Black or White

Antisemitism is Alive and (Un)well All Over the Internet Today

A Major Takeaway from Tim Scott’s Appearance on 'The View'

‘Lashawan Qwadash’: One of the Craziest Beliefs of the Black Hebrew Israelite Cult

Was Esau-Edom White? Demolishing Hebrew Israelite Lies (Part 1)

Why So Much Anti-Jewish Hatred?

NO, the Holocaust is Not Just One of Many Tragic Events of Human History

Kanye (“Ye”), Kyrie, and the Black Hebrew Israelite Elephant in the Room

Seven Steps to Help Unite the Church of America

Baseless Hatred is Destroying Our Nation

The Buffalo Shooter Wanted to Murder Blacks and Jews, Especially Jews

When It Comes to Abortion, Don’t Let the Race Baiters Influence You

It Is Much Easier to Condemn Past Generations Than to Judge Our Own

On University Campuses It Is ‘Free Speech for Me But Not for Thee’

Country Music Says No to Cancel Culture

Time to Cancel Dwayne Johnson (the Rock)?

Is There Blood on the Hands of the Leftist Provocateurs?

The Massive Difference Between Dr. Martin Luther King and BLM

Do You Become a ‘Closet Liberal’ the Moment You Question a Single Conservative Talking Point?

The Tragic Racial Politicizing of the Kyle Rittenhouse Trial

What Many of Us White Americans Still Do Not Understand

If the Democrats Want to Lose Badly in 2022 Here’s the Strategy to Follow

Some Crucial Questions for Proponents and Opponents of CRT

The Obvious Lessons from the Virginia Elections

No, Juan Williams. ‘Parents’ Rights’ Is Not a Code for 'White Race Politics'

No, Mr. Obama this is Not ‘Fake Outrage’

Thoughts on Reparations, Righteousness, CRT, and Justice

Race is Now the 'Elephant in the Room' Even When There is NO Elephant

How the Emphasis On Race Is Dividing America

Grammar Is Racist, Math Is Racist, and So Are You

This Is Why the Official BLM Statement Is So Disturbing